The way you argue your argument is a rhetorical analysis. Rhetorical analysis taught me persuasively argue in 3 different ways. the three different were ethos pathos and logos. If i wanted to persuade using ethos, you show them how credible you are. Ways you would show that is talking from an unbiased perspective, and experience in the topic counts a lot as well. If I wanted to appeal to someone emotionally I would use pathos. If I wrote a paper and wrote it trying to gain sympathy from my reader, I would be using pathos. Statistics, facts, and citing are characteristics of logos. When i think about a Rhetorical Analysis, I think of evaluating writing.
Reflection on Rhetorical Analysis Peer Review
This strategy was a great way to understand what was expected of the Rhetorical analysis. this was around the time when I learned about ethos pathos and logos. by knowing what those three meant, we could successfully critique papers. the sandwich method was learned around this time as well. It was great to learn because I can it incorporate it in my own paper. Giving and receiving constructive criticism is always good to me, and the review helped do just that.
Lesson Learned about Objective Summary
I learned a lot using the objective summary strategy. One of the challenging but most beneficial aspects of the objective summary was explaining what the author was saying without giving your opinion. I am a vocal person who likes to give my view about things. An objective summary is based on facts and not too many details. Some things I learned about the objective summary is how to be more factual, how to explain things with no opinion, and how to be straight to the point with not too many details.
Answers to Questions
A synthesis paper consists of more quotes than personal experience. You are summarizing and critiquing in a synthesis paper. A rhetorical analysis contains no quotes, it is personally based. you are telling what the author is trying to say, or their view on something but not quoting them. The goal of a synthesis paper is to assist you in distinguishing peoples views on a certain topic, and also be able to incorporate your own views. What made this paper hard to write for me was putting quotes in my paper. All the quotes were beneficial, but choosing the most important were kind of hard, and too many quotes wouldnt have made my paper good. This paper was easiest to me when i was able to add my own information to it. I love giving my opinion about things. synthesis is used normally for me, because i get into a lot of debates, which blatantly requires me to give my opinion, and depending on the situation i might quote someone or something important to support my statements.
This video was a brief summary of the case of Troy Davis given by Judge Mathis. Judge Mathis gave his perspective on how he felt about the situation. He felt the case was unfair. They had no evidence against Troy Davis, and Judge Mathis felt he should have been granted a new trial. Judge Mathis said “He was unjustly put to death”, and I agree.
Welcome
My name is Yaw Nyarko Jr, I am a fun and goofy person. I love seeing people smile and love making people laugh. People tell me I have a great personality. I am very friendly I am a sophomore at NIU who loves to play basketball. My major is pharmacy. I love playing video games as well. I look at myself as a bias video game player, because I only buy and play sports games. Follow me on Twitter @ufb_jr.
Hello world!
Welcome to WordPress.com. After you read this, you should delete and write your own post, with a new title above. Or hit Add New on the left (of the admin dashboard) to start a fresh post.
Here are some suggestions for your first post.
- You can find new ideas for what to blog about by reading the Daily Post.
- Add PressThis to your browser. It creates a new blog post for you about any interesting page you read on the web.
- Make some changes to this page, and then hit preview on the right. You can always preview any post or edit it before you share it to the world.
ynyarko889 